Symphony No. 1 in F minor, op. 10; Symphony No. 3 in Eb major,
The First of May, op. 20. Gennadi Rozhdestvensky is one of the greatest proponents of Shostakovich's
music and his enthusiastic performances, especially of unusual and little-known
works, have always been a pleasure. This re-release of these two symphonies
is a pleasure, allowing the rediscovery of Rozhdestvensky's talent in
bringing out important aspects of Shostakovich's scores. These performances
stress the joy and humour inherent in both symphonies - often underplayed
or even left out - particularly in the Third. The melodic lines are clearly
differentiated, which is partly due to the clean sound (almost too clean
and lean in places). Even with the stress on the sardonic and wit, the gravitas in the third
movement is equally present with wonderfully played oboe, clarinet, trumpet,
and violin solos. Rozhdestvensky does not stretch out the Lento
(10:23) to get this effect, as he does in the massacre passage in the
Eleventh Symphony (his being one of the best interpretations). In between
the Finale's baleful introduction with its beautiful choral sound, the
trio-like return to the Lento's sorrow and later the timpani-heralded
return of the same, the fourth movement is played with great gusto, undercut
a little by the lean recording. The solo cello in the middle of the fourth
movement, bringing back the Lento music, is a bit too maudlin for
my taste - this is my only reservation about the musicians' playing here.
The climactic music is theatrical and dramatic, with great trumpet trills
and a terrific ending. Here, more than in any other recording, we feel
the impetuousness of Shostakovich's youth and the excitement of experimentation.
The concluding chorus is performed as almost an obligatory add-on and,
as such, it is done with reservation and a certain shrillness in the singing.
The concluding measures, for orchestra alone, are perfunctory, without
any exclamation on the very last whole note, a held tremolo. It's as if
Rozhdestvensky is saying, "This conclusion isn't so important; however
what precedes it is - very." His attention to the composer's wonderful
writing is what makes these recordings must-haves. Richard Pleak DSCH No. 23. |
|